If you have an interest in parapsychology, pro, con, or whatever, these three talks I’d consider required for coming up to date on things. They aren’t short…. but they are certainly worth your time to watch. Here they are:
“Science and the taboo of psi” with Dean Radin
Global Consciousness Project: An Overview of the GCP (5-parts!)
The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidence

Feel free to register for an account here and comment away!

The number one search term that has brought people to this site is “parapsychology jobs”. This intrigues me as I’ve only mentioned the idea in passing, but the sad fact is… there are very few paying jobs in the field worldwide. Most legitimate parapsych jobs you’ll find are in academia or small, private foundations. In both cases, funding is scarce and dwindling.

It might be because of early reports from Project Stargate, a CIA study of Remote Viewing, which revealed that the technique, though intriguing, yielded no actionable results. (Later declassified info showed that it was somewhat more successful.) It might be any number of factors, but I attribute it to two factors: flakes and debunkers.

First of all, the science of parapsychology has evolved faster than its public image. Fictional movies like Ghostbusters, Dreamscape, and a slew of horror films haven’t helped things. Web sites putting parapsychology in the same bucket as the occult, various religious practices, and such hurt some more. But bad science is the worst. Science, like logic, needs to follow a progression: miss any connection and it ceases to work. Many who study the paranormal miss major points they need to pass first. For instance, is a ghost the spirit of the departed? Well, first, in science and logic, you need to define what a spirit is, and then you need to show how a spirit can exist incorporeally. Now, you can move on to trying to show that a ghost is a spirit… then you move on to showing it as the spirit of a dead person. To my knowledge, there has been only a scant few studies even in trying to figure out is a person’s spirit or soul or whatever can exist at all outside a body. One was so long ago that it calls a lot into question and the other was an excellent study regarding out-of-body experiences in patients having near death experiences. Much more research needs to be done here before we can move on to talking about ghosts being dis-incarnate spirits. Add to this all the people mixing mythology, urban legends, folklore, etc. into supposedly scientific work, and it is no wonder parapsychology gets a bad reputation.  You can find countless examples on the web…

Second, you have some hard core debunkers who, no matter what evidence is presented, will still never allow for anything resembling what we would call paranormal. They completely discard the thousands of solid studies concerning ESP, Remote Viewing, the remote gaze effect, micropsychokinesis, etc. Some of these studies, when analysed, would be ridiculously difficult to fake, showing chance of being random errors in the one in 10^87 range with a coefficient of correlation around .8 or so, combined over hundreds of thousands of individual trials.  These debunkers, usually calling themselves skeptics, will find fault in every experiment, every study.  To make matters worse, they often make big stinks publicizing their “findings” so as to show that none of this exists.  One has even issued a million dollar challenge which, when you read it, is effectively impossible to fulfill.

Somehow in all this, many of the smaller and a few of the larger research facilities in parapsychology have closed their doors.  I don’t know of any legitimate parapsychology jobs in the private sector, because quite simply, there isn’t much of a market for it.  Jobs in the paranormal area are generally catering to New Age or religious customers and almost never involve good scientific work.  The grey area here is the entertainment industry.  Hollywood might have a good place for consultants who can make their movies and TV shows more realistic.  There have, over the years, been a couple TV shows where there might be opportunities.  Personally, I am a fan of SciFi’s “Ghost Hunters” and “Ghost Hunters International” because they use a lot more science in their investigations than any other major production I’ve seen.  They still aren’t parapsychologists, and they don’t pretend to be.  Their work does, however, often cross the line into parapsychology.

So where do I fit in here?  I’m an armchair parapsychologist.  I have no academic qualifications beyond an Associates degree in Science.  I’ve studied the subject on my own, for about 23 years now, beginning in Junior High School, when I took a lab report someone else did and conducted about three years of further research.  I have no laurels to rest upon.  What you read here needs to be taken in its own context and evaluated on its own merit.  While I cannot tell you to believe me because I have a stack of credentials, I do ask that you simply evaluate what I say and write with good, critical thinking and make your own conclusions as my believability, authenticity, and reputation.  Outside of my scientific endeavors (which I hope to detail more here at The Arcanorum), I do have religious interests in similar areas.  I’m careful though to keep my religious beliefs and scientific ideas clearly distinct.  I look at it like a Catholic priest who is also a doctor.  He may believe in the laying on of hands, but he isn’t going to prescribe that to his patients without some scientific backup.

So you still want to be a parapsychologist and make a living doing it?  Good luck.  There are only a couple real accredited programs left in the world, and you’ll probably need a PhD to get one of the jobs out there.  Your best bet is to look into post graduate work at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland.  You should probably have a solid handle on multiple more accepted sciences including statistics and psychology.  For some resources, check out some of the links to your right under the Parapsychology label. (Click on the word “Parapsychology in the links section to see the drop down list.)

Feel free to register for an account here and comment away.  I’d be glad to hear what you think, especially if you do have a real job in parapsychology… or if you’d like to offer me one. (Yes, I’d change careers to parapsychology if it included a steady pay check…)

First of all, neither I nor The Arcanorum charge for investigations. We consider these to be scientific research and requiring money from people reaching out for help would not be ethical.

That said, we do sometimes ask for money for some other things.

We do accept donations, but will NOT refuse to do any investigation because of a lack of a donation. If we need to travel more than two hours drive, we will ask that you cover some of our travel expenses. We think this is reasonable. All our investigations do involve us spending our own, out of pocket money. We insist on using only fresh batteries in some of our equipment and we do get picky about certain brands. The move to digital photography and audio recorders has reduced our costs, but the batteries are still needed. We also need to get to and from an investigation and usually we will stop on the way for snacks. The equipment we use can get pretty expensive and as always, we use our own money for this. We all have our “day jobs” to pay these expenses, so we do not require clients to cover them. If anyone, client or not, wishes to help us out we generally won’t refuse your help.

From time to time, we may offer promotional items on this web site or as an affiliate to other sites. The proceeds from any of these purchases will go to a general research fund to help reimburse the costs of equipment and expendables. Again, no purchase is necessary, though every one helps. You can purchase items through The Curio Shop to help us out. You can also make direct donations through PayPal to brian@arcanorum.org

One unique service The Arcanorum has offered from its inception is the disposal of “cursed” or unwanted objects with some connection to the occult or paranormal. This service is NOT a scientific investigation. It does often involve time, labor, and materials and as such, we have a sliding scale that we charge to people depending on a number of factors. We will always keep it reasonable. As an example, disposing of large furniture might require that we hire a moving truck. Disposal of large stone or metal objects might likewise require extra expenses. For smaller items like trinkets, clothing, etc., we will likely only ask for a fee to make it worth our time, usually around $20 to cover local travel and a meal. What we do with the items is our choice. We may destroy them outright. We may make attempts to render them “safe”. We may place them in a safer location. We may use them for further research. We may even simply place them on a shelf as mementos. What we do is our choice. If you want something gone from your life or home, we can take it off your hands. We do not accept items what would be illegal to own or possess. We do not accept any modern firearms or hazardous materials, or explosives. In short, if you can’t legally send it through the US Postal Service without special licenses, we will not accept it. Otherwise, we can handle it, no matter how haunted or cursed it may be.

(This was originally posted elsewhere in my personal blog. I’m reposting it here, as it is quite appropriate to this site. I’ll answer some comments form the original post at the bottom.)

OK, I’ve been studying the paranormal since some time around the 6th grade. That would have been the mid 1980′s… so about 20-25 years now. People I talk to about it are often surprised at the info I’ve gathered from fairly reputable sources, both “believers” and “skeptics”. For me, belief has nothing to do with it. It’s like gravity – we know it’s there, we know about some other forces that can emulate it, but we know very little actually about the real thing.

So… what have I learned in that time? I’ll pass on citing most references, as honestly I don’t remember some of the details. (Can YOU cite sources for something you learned 20 years ago?!?) A lot of this is really quite recent. Some isn’t.

- Ouija Boards… Yes, the participants ARE pushing the pointer. They are NOT doing so consciously, and are generally NOT aware that they are doing so (book reference mid ’80′s.). Usually, (when it is successful) one participant serves as a medium or contact and directs the movement. Again, this is NOT conscious movement. BUT… generally, that person’s eyes need to be able to see the board and often, oddly, the board needs to be close to right-side-up for that person. (Personal experimentation, mid to late 80′s). As for where the intelligence behind the messages comes from, more experimentation is needed.

- Apparitions… Full-bodied apparitions, ghosts, if you will, look 3-dimensional, solid, “real” and not spooky, glowing things you see in movies. They may look out of place for the time and conditions. A subjective feeling of un-ease in the observer(s) often accompanies them. They do NOT glow in the dark, though they seem to more commonly be seen in poor lighting conditions, especially at night. Very often, they will be gone if the observer does what is commonly referred to as a “double take”. They look away, think, “WTF?!?” and look back and the apparition is gone. I have seen one apparition near running water and try to cross it. The apparition disappeared instantly upon touching the water, but footstep sounds continued for some seconds. This is what clued me in that this was a ghost and not someone dressed in a period costume.

- Remote Viewing… This has raised more questions than it has answered. Fully controlled experiments have yielded correct but most often, in government terms not “actionable” reports, gathered by these means. supposedly using the exact same methods, some VERY whacked out information has been reported, casting doubts on either the sanity of the viewer and/or the nature or our world and reality in general. In my opinion, the sessions need to focus on THIS reality, and THIS time in THIS reality in order to yield useful results. By FAR, the best info on this topis can be found at the “Firedocs” website and a lecture by one of the key participants in the US Government study, Dr. Harold (Hal) Puthoff.

- Precognition… While precognition is mostly unproven, presentiment has some very convincing evidence to it. In laymen’s terms, knowing the future by anomalous means is unlikely, but having emotional reactions before the causing stimulus is well documented. Older studies have also shown a similar pre-action in plants.

- ESP in general… Much has been studied. A study in India claims to have located the parts of the brain by usinf a functional MRI scan of people involved in Ganzfeld experiments in telepathy. In the fall of 2008, a study in the UK found a strong correlation between ESP success and geomagnetic activity.According to the abstract, “Two patterns were observed: ESP was found to succeed only during periods of enhanced pulsation activity within the 0.2-0.5 Hz band, but ESP effect was absent during the most disturbed periods of activity in the 0.025-0.1 Hz band.” Obviously, this points to an interesting direction for further study. Generally, as with precognition vs. presentiment, emotions can more easily be sensed anomalously than information. That’s likely why Zener card studies have so often shown poor results while more emotionally charged thought transfers have succeeded better. Meta-analysis, according to one book I have, has shown a weak, but strongly present anomalous effect (it is difficult to distinguish precognition here from micro psychokinesis) in the .0X% range with a .8 correlational coefficient. This is effected by the subject’s boredom levels and the effect is actually reversed (a process called “anti-psi”) if the subject is a strong disbeliever, showing an anomalously high number of “wrong” answers.

Some less-formal studies include those at http://www.sgha.net/ where they found some very interesting results.

- Hauntings… Here there is a wealth of really bad, unscientific information, bad science, and plain old fraud. There is also some very good info out there. Weeding through it all takes a critical mind and a LOT of patience. Some very good studies have been made regarding infrasound which indicate that certain loud sounds too low for the human to hear may cause feelings of dread or sanctity. A study online, which has long been missing (404) was looking into “negative space” in architectural design and its effect on the human psyche relating to hauntings. (Archived here.) Studies of the effects of electromagnetic radiation of humans in regard to the subjects perceptions of haunted locations has yielded mixed and seemingly contradictory results. Purported ghostly photographs showing “orbs” have been pretty well debunked and explained by the folks over at ghostgadgets.com in this essay and by their experimental use of a device designed to test their hypothesis, called the DEVA. My own research on “EVP” or Electronic Voice Phenomena shows that some of these anomalies can be cleared into intelligible speech patterns by simply reversing the audio, changing the playback speed, and/or cleaning up the background noise. Recent trends to eek EVPs out of white noise or pink noise are an exercise in pareidolia and can be pretty generally be discounted due to this well known and documented psychological phenomenon. Perhaps, one could devise an analytical approach using computerized speech recognition to rule it out some day, but the technology is not there yet.

As with ghosts in general, the major problem in studying hauntings is that it is exceedingly difficult to study anything in a scientific manner that you cannot reliably and predictably repeat. While we can rule out many explainable causes and influences, and even go a fairly good job at simulating some of the characteristics of a real haunting, studies of the real thing are extremely elusive for this reason. Until a haunting can be found to be scientifically repeatable, we may never know for sure very much about this anomalous phenomenon.

- Poltergeists… These are most often characterized today as “Recurrent Spontaneous Psychokinesis” or RSPK, as they usually center around an adolescent and the activities and intelligence of the forces demonstrated are strongly connected to that person. This subject or focus person is often in a stressful emotional state and the RSPK manifestations usually cease when this state is removed, either by changes in the environment, life, or by psychological therapy. There are, of course, reported exceptions, but these are extremely rare, even among this rare phenomenon. The effects are not known to cause major injuries or death in any case I’ve ever heard of, though the possibility is there. Some of the moved objects have shown signs of anomalous temperature changes, often found to be warm or very hot when touched immediately after a manifestation.

- Demons, Angels, etc… Most often these are a result of someone anthropomorphizing one or more explainable or anomalous phenomena (or a combination of the two) in accordance to that person’s belief structure or world view. Again, there is room for the existence of exceptions, but this is the general rule in my experience. The accepted authority on demonic possession in the world has been the Vatican. From the reports and inside rumors I’ve heard, even this huge organisation only deals with a handful of real cases a year world wide (at most!) and many still question these. Insider rumors I’ve heard put the number at (sometimes well) under half a dozen on average. While the Vatican has recently increased the number of people it authorizes to perform exorcisms, I’ve seen no reports of an increase in the number actually performed. It seems to me that the reasoning for this is that the ritual is extremely hard on those involved and having more around to do it lessons the burden. In short, you’re more likely to get struck by lightning. Much more likely. …than to encounter a real demon.

- Psychokinesis… Lots of research done into micro-PK, but many have pointed out that it is diifficult to distinguish micro-PK from precognition in many earlier experiments. See above for info on statistical results. Macro-PK is still quite elusive. Many individuals have reported on the internet that they’ve had some success with a device called a “psi wheel”, a pinwheel like device balanced on a pin so as to have little friction and which is often covered with a transparent cover to exclude wind. I have one. They are pretty simple to make. I have had no success with it to date. It would be very incomplete of me not to mention the seemingly astounding siccess of the Russian lady, Nina Kulagina, who wowed the world with her display of macro-PK effects from the 1960′s till her death in 1990. There were several studies done and the controversy still rages today, as many of the effects she produced can be faked using “invisible” nylon thread. The physiological changes her body manifested were pretty incontrovertible, though they might be explained by nervousness at the possibility of being caught faking the effects. Her case may never be fully proven one way or the other.

- Fraud… It is essential in the study of the paranormal to be able to rule out fraud. In my opinion, the best way to do that is to know how to fake the effects and therefore guard against them. Thus, I have also made it a habit of studying slight of hand, illusions, and generally what the Brits call conjuring. By careful experimental design and statistical analysis of well executed experiments, we can better learn the real effects and rule out the fraudulent ones.

Further, there is the factor of those seeking attention either for personal gain or just for the attention itself. While some people who may have genuine paranormal abilities may and do become famous, there are also many who are only showmen, yet present themselves as having paranormal abilities. Further complicating matters, are those who both have genuine talents AND are natural showmen. These are the people the frauds try to emulate. Telling the difference is often best accomplished by trying to figure out the intention of the person in question. To help things along, for those paying attention, I do not associate myself with frauds. I have several friends with genuine abilities and a couple also have an element of fame. I also have friends who practice slight of hand who are quite honest about what they are doing, and quite skilled at doing it. Also: NOT frauds.

Yet another wrench in the works, is the phenomenon of basically honest, but …shall we say… misguided… people who think they’re doing the world a service but only seem to mangle matters further. Again, people I do not associate with, and if you catch me in private, in the right mood, I’ll rant about them. They are all too common. One I’ll refer to here, I saw give a presentation while I was in college, along with her now late husband and associates. Famous. Exaggerated. Completely unscientific. Self-described experts often referred to AS experts. Probably genuinely believe their own hype.

So there you have it, in a nutshell. If you have something to add, comment away!

Read the rest of this entry »